Label facts

Lymph Flow Supplement Facts and Label Details

By the Lymph Flow Editorial Desk · Last updated September 25, 2026 · how we check facts

This page would normally transcribe a Supplement Facts panel row by row. There is no panel to transcribe. What follows instead is an account of what a label is required to carry, what this one carries, and what can honestly be derived from the single quantity that exists.

Lymph Flow lists a 600 mg proprietary blend per two-dropper serving.

That blend is shared by six named ingredients, with no amount given for each. A full Supplement Facts panel is not printed on the bottle artwork.

See the six ingredients.

The five statements a label must carry

“Five statements are required: 1) the statement of identity (name of the dietary supplement), 2) the net quantity of contents statement (amount of the dietary supplement), 3) the nutrition labeling, 4) the ingredient list, and 5) the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor.”
U.S. Food and Drug Administration — Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter I. General Dietary Supplement Labeling

The FDA’s five required statements, against what was supplied with this product.
Required statement	Supplied?	What was supplied
Statement of identity	Yes	The front of the bottle reads LYMPH FLOW and Dietary Supplement.
Net quantity of contents	Yes	The front of the bottle reads 2 fl oz (59 mL).
Nutrition labeling	No	No Supplement Facts panel appears on any image, graphic or document supplied with this product. The one quantity that exists anywhere — 600 mg of blend per serving — is printed in a marketing graphic, not on a label.
The ingredient list	Partly	Six ingredients are named, but in the marketing rather than on the bottle: boswellia serrata, curcumin, horse chestnut, gotu kola, quercetin phytosome and ginger extract. No amount, no plant part, no standardisation and no Other Ingredients line accompanies any of them.
Name and place of business	No	No manufacturer, packer or distributor is named on the product. The retail desk’s own New York addresses are published on this site, and they are not the same thing.

Statements one and two are printed large, on the face of the bottle, where a buyer is being persuaded. Statements three, four and five are the ones normally printed small, on the information panel, where a buyer goes to decide. That is the shape of this product’s disclosure in a sentence.

The Lymph Flow bottle: an amber glass dropper bottle labelled alcohol free, herbal extracts, liquid drops, dietary supplement 2 fl oz 59 mL — The complete Lymph Flow label. Everything printed on this product appears in this photograph: the brand, the words alcohol free, herbal extracts, liquid drops, and the net quantity.

The one number, and where it lives

Everything quantitative known about this product is one sentence, and it is not on a label. The graphic headed How Lymph Flow Works reads: “Each 2-dropper serving delivers 600 mg of our proprietary blend”. The sentence continues “a careful mix of ancient herbs and” and then stops.

The marketing graphic enlarged, showing the sentence Each 2-dropper serving delivers 600 mg of our proprietary blend, cut off after the words a careful mix of ancient herbs and — The supplied graphic, enlarged. The sentence carrying this product’s only quantity is cut off after the words “a careful mix of ancient herbs and”.

It is worth being exact about why the location of that figure changes what can be done with it. A quantity on a Supplement Facts panel sits inside a structure the FDA defines: the blend’s total weight must be declared, and its ingredients must be listed “in descending order of predominance by weight”. That second requirement is what converts an undisclosed blend into six arithmetic ceilings on every other product this desk has covered.

A quantity in a marketing graphic carries none of that. The 600 mg may well be accurate — nothing here suggests otherwise — but the six names beside it are in whatever order the designer chose. That is the whole of the difference, and it is the reason every ceiling on this site is printed with the word if in front of it.

The conditional ceilings

If the marketing order is the weight orderSix ingredients, 600 mg a serving, and no panel to order them on

01Boswellia SerrataListed first. NCCIH describes it as an extract of the tree’s gum resin or bark.at most 600 mg

02CurcuminThe measured compound of turmeric, named directly rather than as an extract.at most 300 mg

03Horse ChestnutNo plant part, no extract and no standardisation is stated. See finding 5.at most 200 mg

04Gotu KolaNo monograph at either body this desk reads.at most 150 mg

05Quercetin PhytosomeA phospholipid-complexed form. No monograph at either body.at most 120 mg

06Ginger ExtractNo plant part and no standardisation stated.at most 100 mg

Treat every figure in that column as conditional. The FDA’s descending-order rule governs the Supplement Facts panel, and this product has no panel. The order above is the order the marketing graphic and the seller pack happen to use. If that order is the weight order, these are the ceilings; if it is not, they mean nothing. On every other product this desk covers the rule can be relied on. Here it cannot, and that is itself the finding.

600 mg, divided six ways — conditionallyWhat the descending-order rule would give, if it applied.

Boswellia serrata, if listed first by weightat most 600 mg

Curcuminat most 300 mg

Horse chestnutat most 200 mg

Gotu kolaat most 150 mg

Quercetin phytosomeat most 120 mg

Ginger extractat most 100 mg

50 mg100 mg200 mg400 mg800 mg

Every bar here is conditional. The FDA’s descending-order rule applies to the Supplement Facts panel, and this product has no panel. The order used above is the order the marketing graphic and the seller pack happen to print the six names in. If that is also the weight order, the ceilings are 600 mg divided by each position. If it is not, the bars mean nothing. On every other product this desk covers the rule can be leaned on; here it cannot, which is why the chart is drawn with the caveat attached rather than in a footnote.

One answer from the order desk would settle it: are the six ingredients listed in descending order of weight? If yes, every bar above becomes a fact. If no, they all disappear and this product publishes nothing quantitative about any individual ingredient at all.

Boswellia’s best case

600 mg at most, against the doses the trials usedThe boswellia best case set beside the amounts NCCIH records.

Lymph Flow, boswellia best caseat most 600 mg

Trials NCCIH records as safe for 6 monthsup to 1,000 mg

Used with apparent safety for 1 month2,400 mg

100 mg300 mg600 mg1.2 g2.4 g

The amber bar is a ceiling on a ceiling. Boswellia is listed first of six, so on the conditional reading it cannot exceed the blend total of 600 mg — and reaching that figure would require the other five ingredients to be absent entirely. The real amount is lower, and nothing published says by how much. The reference bars are NCCIH’s: it records “doses up to 1,000 mg daily… safely used in several clinical trials lasting up to 6 months” and use “at a dose of 2,400 mg for up to 1 month”. Its verdict on all of it: “there is not enough high-quality evidence to determine whether boswellia is useful for any health condition”.

That amber bar is generous twice over. It assumes the marketing order is the weight order, and it assumes boswellia is the entire blend — 600 mg with nothing left for curcumin, horse chestnut, gotu kola, quercetin or ginger. On both assumptions at once it still sits below the range NCCIH records as studied.

The fair conclusion is not “this will not work”. NCCIH’s summary of the whole boswellia literature, at any dose, is that “there is not enough high-quality evidence to determine whether boswellia is useful for any health condition”. So the comparison is between a small amount and a set of trials that did not settle the question at amounts several times larger. The full row is on the ingredients page.

The horse chestnut question

This is the most important paragraph on this site, and it is made of two consecutive sentences from one public source.

“The raw seeds, bark, flowers, and leaves of horse chestnut are unsafe when used orally because they contain a toxic component. Standardized horse chestnut seed extracts, from which this component has been removed, are likely safe for short-term use and have been used safely in research studies for up to 12 weeks.”
NCCIH — Horse Chestnut: Usefulness and Safety

Everything separating unsafe when used orally from likely safe lives in three words: standardized, seed, extract. This product prints “Horse Chestnut”. There is no plant part. There is no statement that it is an extract. There is no standardisation. And because there is no Supplement Facts panel, there is no second document to check.

What would have to be printed for this question to be answerable, and what is.
Detail	What we were actually given
Plant part	Not printed. NCCIH names seeds, bark, flowers and leaves as the raw materials that are unsafe orally; only the seed appears in the safe form.
Whether it is an extract	Not printed. The word extract appears for the ginger row and not for this one.
Whether it is standardised	Not printed. This is the word NCCIH uses to describe the form from which the toxic component has been removed.
The amount	Not printed. Conditionally at most 200 mg, third of six.
On the Supplement Facts panel	There is no panel.

What this site is and is not saying

It is not saying this product contains the unsafe form. There is no evidence for that, and implying it would be exactly the kind of thing this site exists to avoid. It is saying that the single distinction the relevant public body draws between a preparation it calls unsafe and one it calls likely safe is a distinction this product does not make anywhere — and that a buyer who wants to check it has nowhere to look. It is the first question on the call script, and one sentence from the seller would answer it.

What, exactly, is a dropper?

The directions read: “Shake well. Mix one serving (2 droppers) into a glass of water or juice once daily, or as directed by your healthcare professional.” That instruction is complete in every respect except the one that decides the dose.

What a two-dropper serving works out at, across the plausible range.
If one dropper delivers…	…because	A serving is	Servings in a 59 mL bottle	Blend per millilitre
0.6 mL	a light squeeze of a 1 mL pipette	1.2 mL	about 49	about 500 mg
0.75 mL	a typical single squeeze	1.5 mL	about 39	about 400 mg
0.9 mL	a firm squeeze	1.8 mL	about 33	about 333 mg
1.0 mL	a pipette filled to the mark	2.0 mL	about 30	about 300 mg

Two consequences. The first is practical: a bottle lasts between about 30 and 49 days, and the 60-day money-back window runs from purchase, so where a bottle lands in that range decides whether it finishes inside the window.

The second is the last column. The same 600 mg in less liquid means a higher concentration, so across the range the bottle implies roughly 300 to 500 milligrams of blend in every millilitre — about 30% to 50% by weight per volume.

Why that column is a question rather than a conclusion

It is a high loading for any liquid, and three supplied facts bear on it. The bottle is labelled ALCOHOL FREE. NCCIH describes boswellia as “an herbal extract made from the gum resin or bark of the tree”, and gum resins are poorly soluble in water, which is the usual reason such preparations are made with ethanol. And the directions begin “Shake well”, which on a liquid normally indicates that the contents settle — that is, that material is suspended rather than dissolved. Nothing supplied names the carrier, the solvent or any excipient, so none of this resolves here. It is the fourth question on the call script.

Everything the bottle says

Transcribed in full. This is not an excerpt.

Everything printed on the Lymph Flow bottle artwork.
Detail	What we were actually given
Front panel	ALCOHOL FREE · LYMPH FLOW · Herbal Extracts · Liquid Drops · Dietary Supplement 2 fl oz (59 mL)
Suggested use	Not on the bottle. The directions quoted on this site come from the seller pack and the marketing graphic.
Supplement Facts panel	None.
Ingredient list	Not on the bottle. Six names appear in marketing artwork only.
Other ingredients	Not published. No Other Ingredients line was supplied, and no carrier, solvent, preservative or sweetener is named anywhere — on a liquid.
Allergen statement	Not printed.
Caution or warning	Not printed. No caution or warning block appears on the bottle artwork or on any graphic supplied with this product.
Storage	Not printed on anything supplied.
Distributed by	Not printed. No manufacturer, packer or distributor appears on the product.
Country of manufacture	Not printed. No country of manufacture appears on the bottle artwork supplied.
FDA statement	Printed on the marketing graphic, not on the bottle: “These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”

Five of those eleven rows read not printed or none, and two more point at marketing artwork rather than at the product. The bottle carries a brand, a product descriptor, a net quantity and the words alcohol free. That is the complete label.

The ten marks

Ten marks were supplied alongside this product. Not one of them is printed on the bottle artwork itself, none names a certifying body or carries a registration number, and every one of them is a pixel-for-pixel match for a file supplied with three other, unrelated brands. Eight are shown below; two are not published on this site, and the reasons follow.

The shared badge set

This desk compared each of the ten marks against the asset folders of every other product received in the same run, by downsampling both images to 64×64 pixels and measuring the mean absolute difference per colour channel. A difference of zero means the files are the same image. Ten of ten matched Lungora, a lung supplement. Ten of ten matched Slim Metrix, a weight-loss supplement. Nine of ten matched Zencortex, an ear-health supplement. The payment-card strip matched as well. The mean difference on every one of those matches was 0.00.

The same made-in-USA roundel as supplied with four different brands, each under a different filename, all reading MANUFACTURE IN twice around the ring — The same file, supplied with four unrelated brands under four different names. Each ring reads MANUFACTURE IN at the top and MANUFACTURE IN again at the bottom, and never completes the phrase.

The two that are not shown

The “made in USA” roundel is misprinted. Its ring reads MANUFACTURE IN around the top and MANUFACTURE IN around the bottom. The phrase is ungrammatical, it is duplicated, and it never finishes — the word USA appears only in the centre device, not in the sentence. A mark that cannot spell its own claim is not evidence of anything, and this site does not reproduce it as a trust signal.

The “Doctor Formulated” badge names no doctor. No name, no credential, no registration number and no statement of what the doctor is supposed to have done. This desk does not publish a practitioner endorsement without a practitioner, and it does not invent one. That file, too, is shared with all three other brands.

Worth repeating on its own line: not one of the ten marks is printed on the bottle artwork. Every one of them lives in the marketing folder. A mark that appears in a sales asset but not on the product is a claim made by the seller rather than by the label. The seals page sets out what each of the eight published marks is a claim about.

Twelve findings, in full

Each is a statement about this product, checked against a source linked at the foot of the page. They are ordered by how much they should change a decision.

01There is no Supplement Facts panel. Two of the FDA’s five required statements are supplied in full.

The FDA’s labeling guide lists five statements a dietary supplement label must carry: the statement of identity, the net quantity of contents, the nutrition labeling, the ingredient list, and the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer or distributor. This product supplies the first two clearly — LYMPH FLOW, Dietary Supplement, 2 fl oz (59 mL). It supplies no nutrition labeling at all. It names six ingredients but only in marketing artwork, with no amounts, no plant parts and no Other Ingredients line. And it names no manufacturer, packer or distributor anywhere.

02The only quantity that exists is one sentence in a marketing graphic.

“Each 2-dropper serving delivers 600 mg of our proprietary blend”, from the graphic headed How Lymph Flow Works. That is the whole of the quantitative disclosure for this product. It is not on the bottle, it is not on a panel, and the sentence it appears in is cut off mid-clause. Six ingredients share that 600 mg and not one of them carries a figure.

03Because there is no panel, even the usual ceilings cannot be relied on.

On every other product this desk covers, a proprietary blend still yields information: the FDA requires the ingredients “in descending order of predominance by weight”, so the item in position n cannot exceed the total divided by n. That rule governs the Supplement Facts panel. This product has no panel, so the order the six names appear in — boswellia, curcumin, horse chestnut, gotu kola, quercetin, ginger — is a marketing sequence with no regulatory weight behind it. If it is the weight order, the ceilings are 600, 300, 200, 150, 120 and 100 mg. This site prints them and labels every one of them conditional.

04Even the most generous reading puts the largest ingredient below the studied dose.

Boswellia is listed first, so on the conditional reading above it is capped at 600 mg — and that is the ceiling for the whole blend, meaning the other five would be zero. NCCIH records that “Boswellia serrata extract in doses up to 1,000 mg daily has been safely used in several clinical trials lasting up to 6 months”. So the best case for the best-placed ingredient is below the studied range, and every ingredient below it is further below. NCCIH’s own summary is that “there is not enough high-quality evidence to determine whether boswellia is useful for any health condition”.

05“Horse Chestnut” names no plant part, no extract and no standardisation — and that is the distinction that decides its safety.

This is the finding on this product that matters most. NCCIH states plainly: “The raw seeds, bark, flowers, and leaves of horse chestnut are unsafe when used orally because they contain a toxic component.” It then states what is different about the processed material: “Standardized horse chestnut seed extracts, from which this component has been removed, are likely safe for short-term use and have been used safely in research studies for up to 12 weeks.” The entire difference between the unsafe form and the likely-safe one is the words standardised, seed and extract. This product prints “Horse Chestnut” and nothing else. That is not evidence that the product contains the unsafe form — it is that the one distinction NCCIH draws cannot be checked from anything published here.

06“Two droppers” is not a measurement, so neither the dose volume nor how long a bottle lasts can be worked out.

The directions read: “Shake well. Mix one serving (2 droppers) into a glass of water or juice once daily, or as directed by your healthcare professional.” A dropper is a piece of glass, not a unit. How much a pipette delivers depends on its length, its bore and how hard the bulb is squeezed, and the label does not state a volume in millilitres. Across the plausible range — roughly 0.6 mL to 1.0 mL a squeeze — a two-dropper serving is somewhere between 1.2 and 2.0 mL, which makes a 59 mL bottle last anywhere from 30 to 49 days. The 60-day money-back window runs from purchase, so that spread decides whether a bottle finishes inside it.

07The same arithmetic implies a concentration between about 300 and 500 milligrams per millilitre.

If a serving is 600 mg of blend in somewhere between 1.2 and 2.0 mL of liquid, the bottle carries roughly 300 to 500 mg of blend in every millilitre — that is, between about 30% and 50% by weight per volume. That is a high loading for any liquid. It is worth knowing alongside two other supplied facts: the bottle is labelled ALCOHOL FREE, and NCCIH describes boswellia as “an herbal extract made from the gum resin or bark of the tree”. Gum resins are poorly soluble in water, which is the usual reason such preparations are made with ethanol. The directions begin “Shake well”, which on a liquid normally means the contents settle. Nothing supplied names the carrier, the solvent or any excipient, so none of this can be resolved — it is a question for the order desk.

08Two of the six ingredients have no monograph at the bodies this desk reads.

Gotu kola and quercetin return no fact sheet at NCCIH’s Herbs at a Glance index or at the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements under the names printed. The only NIH hits are entries in the Dietary Supplement Label Database — photographs of other products’ labels, which record what is sold rather than what is known. That is a statement about available information, not a verdict: nothing can be said about either ingredient here, in either direction. The other four — boswellia, curcumin, horse chestnut and ginger — do have monographs, which is a better hit rate than most products this desk covers.

09None of the six has a lymphatic monograph, and lymphoedema is a condition with real management.

The product is sold to “support your body’s natural lymphatic drainage and circulation”. Searching the four ingredients that do have monographs returns files on osteoarthritis, inflammation, nausea, menstrual cramps and chronic venous insufficiency — nothing on the lymphatic system. The closest any ingredient comes is horse chestnut, which NCCIH says is “promoted for chronic venous insufficiency” and for which “a 2012 systematic review of 17 studies suggested that horse chestnut seed extract can improve symptoms of CVI” — a venous condition, not a lymphatic one, and again the seed extract. Meanwhile the National Cancer Institute records that lymphoedema “is a chronic condition that cannot be cured but can be treated”, with compression, manual lymphatic drainage performed by a therapist, exercise and skin care, and advises: “Contact your doctor as soon as you notice heaviness, swelling, or other signs of lymphedema.”

10Every mark supplied with this product is a pixel-for-pixel match for a file supplied with three other brands.

Ten marks came with this product. This desk compared each against the asset folders of every other product in the same batch by downsampling both to 64×64 pixels and measuring the mean absolute difference per channel. A difference of zero means the files are the same image. Ten of ten matched Lungora, a lung supplement. Ten matched Slim Metrix, a weight-loss supplement. Nine matched Zencortex, an ear-health supplement. The payment-card strip matched too. Among them is a “made in USA” roundel whose ring reads “MANUFACTURE IN” at the top and “MANUFACTURE IN” again at the bottom — a sentence that is ungrammatical, duplicated and never finished. The same misprint appears on all four brands. Neither that roundel nor the “Doctor Formulated” mark, which names no doctor, is published on this site.

11Six generated portraits, a physician badge naming no physician, and a pack that calls its own reviews layout copy.

The asset folder contains six photographs captioned as customers: a young man, a young woman, a middle-aged woman, an older woman, a Latina woman and a middle-aged man. They are synthetic images of people who do not exist, and none appears on this site. A “Doctor Formulated” badge was supplied naming no doctor, no credential and no registration number; it is the same file supplied with three other brands. The pack also supplied 4.4 out of 5, 1,278 written reviews, 8,787 orders and 91% recommending — and then stated in its own closing block that “reviews, star scores, and order counts in this pack are layout copy only”. This site publishes no rating, no review count and no testimonials.

12Three of the four captions in the marketing graphic are cut off mid-sentence, and the order desk is shared with another brand.

The graphic headed How Lymph Flow Works has four numbered steps. Step 1 ends “or as directed by”. Step 2 ends “a careful mix of ancient herbs and”. Step 4 ends “speaking to your healthcare professional before”. Only step 3 finishes. The document that carries this product’s only quantity cannot finish three of its own four sentences. Separately, the order line +1 (302) 200-3480 is the same number supplied with an unrelated chewable oral-health product in an earlier batch, and both packs describe it in the same words as a “BuyGoods default order desk” — a payment processor’s desk rather than either brand’s.

References

Every source below was opened and read. Where a quotation appears on this page, it is copied from the page linked here.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter I. General Dietary Supplement Labeling.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter IV. Nutrition Labeling.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). Horse Chestnut: Usefulness and Safety.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). Boswellia: Usefulness and Safety.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). Turmeric: Usefulness and Safety.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). Ginger: Usefulness and Safety.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2026). Herbs at a Glance: A-to-Z index.
National Cancer Institute (2024). Lymphedema and Cancer.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). Detoxes and Cleanses: What You Need To Know.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements.

Ask for the panel, and ask about the horse chestnut

A 2 fl oz bottle of liquid drops, two droppers a day, and no Supplement Facts panel on anything supplied with it. The only quantity that exists — 600 mg of blend a serving — is printed in a marketing graphic. No price was supplied either; the live figure and the 60-day return terms are on the seller’s checkout screen.

Order Lymph Flow See pricing

60-day window · Questions first? Call +1 (302) 200-3480

Keep reading

The six rows in detailConditional ceilings, and what each file actually says.Safety and what cannot be checkedThe horse chestnut question, and the missing carrier.Why there are no reviews hereThe score this desk gives, and the block it refused.