Verification
Lymph Flow batch and certificate references
Five questions, in the order worth asking them. Each one is answerable by the seller in a sentence or two, each one changes what this site can say, and none of them has been answered by anything supplied so far.
Ask, in this order: (1) send the Supplement Facts panel; (2) is the horse chestnut a standardised seed extract; (3) what does one dropper hold in millilitres; (4) what is the 600 mg dissolved or suspended in; (5) send the Certificate of Analysis. Call +1 (302) 200-3480 with your order ID, and send the same list to [email protected] so the answers arrive dated and in writing.
The call script, in order
Please send the Supplement Facts panel for this product
The first question, and the one that matters most. No panel appears on the bottle artwork, in any marketing graphic, or in the seller pack supplied to this desk. A panel would give the six ingredients an order, an amount and an Other Ingredients line in one document.
Is the horse chestnut a standardised seed extract?
NCCIH states that the raw seeds, bark, flowers and leaves are “unsafe when used orally”, and that standardised seed extracts, with the toxic component removed, are “likely safe for short-term use”. The label prints “Horse Chestnut” and nothing else. One sentence settles it.
What does one dropper hold, in millilitres?
The directions say two droppers. A dropper is a piece of glass, not a unit, so this figure decides the dose, the number of servings in a bottle and whether a bottle finishes inside the return window.
What is the 600 mg dissolved or suspended in?
There is no Other Ingredients line, so no carrier, solvent, preservative or sweetener is named — on a liquid. The bottle says ALCOHOL FREE, which names one thing it is not.
Please send the Certificate of Analysis
The reference held here is LYM-1909-26-LY, supplied with the pack. The document itself was not supplied.
Ask them in that order, because each one narrows the next. If the panel arrives, questions three and four may be answered inside it and question two probably is, which is the whole reason it comes first. If it does not arrive, the remaining four are still worth asking individually: each one closes a gap that this site currently has to describe rather than report.
What a good answer looks like
A useful answer is a document or a number. A poor answer is an adjective. This table is what to listen for.
| Question | A good answer | A poor answer | What it changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| The panel | A photograph or PDF of the panel as printed | “It’s a proprietary blend” | Most of this site. The conditional ceilings become facts or vanish |
| Horse chestnut | “Standardised seed extract, x per cent aescin” | “It’s all natural” | The single most consequential safety question on this product |
| The dropper | “0.75 mL a squeeze, 39 servings a bottle” | “Two droppers” | Your dose, your bottle life and your return window |
| The carrier | A named solvent and an Other Ingredients line | “Purified water and natural ingredients” | Whether the alcohol-free claim and the 300-to-500 mg-per-mL loading can be reconciled |
| The certificate | A dated lab document naming the batch and the assays | The reference number again | Whether any of the 600 mg has ever been measured by anyone |
Two notes on tone. None of these questions is hostile, and none needs to be asked as though it were: a seller with a compliant label answers all five in a single reply, and several of them are things a customer-service desk is asked every week. And none of them is commercially sensitive — a Supplement Facts panel is a document intended to be read by buyers.
And if nothing arrives at all, that is an answer too. Five questions, all answerable, none commercially sensitive, sent to a desk that takes money for the product. Silence on all five is a data point about disclosure, and the return window is the mechanism for acting on it.
The lot and certificate references
Two references were supplied with the product pack, and this site is careful about what they are.
| Detail | What we were actually given |
|---|---|
| Lot reference | LYM-26/LY-1909 — a draft reference supplied with the pack. |
| Certificate reference | LYM-1909-26-LY — a draft reference. The document itself was not supplied. |
| Was a lot number legible on the bottle images? | No. Nothing supplied confirms this reference is printed on any bottle. |
| Best-before date | Not legible on the images supplied. |
| Are they laboratory proof? | No. A reference is a label, not a result. No lab letter, licence or test report is reproduced on this site. |
| Is a batch number the same as a test? | No. A lot number identifies a production run. It says nothing about what was measured in it. |
This matters because a reference number reads like verification. It is not: the two strings above are what the seller wrote down, and this desk publishes them as what they are so a buyer can quote them on the phone and ask what they refer to.
What a certificate can and cannot show
A Certificate of Analysis is a laboratory document for a production batch: what was tested, by what method, and what the result was. On this product there is a problem before that document even arrives.
There is nothing to check it against. A certificate confirms that a batch matches a declaration — and the declaration is the Supplement Facts panel, which does not exist here. A certificate for a product with no panel can confirm contaminant limits and perhaps a total weight, but it cannot confirm that the bottle contains what the label says, because the label does not say.
Which is why the panel comes first
Ask for the panel before the certificate, in that order, for a concrete reason: the panel is the thing the certificate would be checked against. Without it, a certificate is a set of numbers with nothing to compare them to. With it, the two documents together would move this product from almost nothing disclosed to ordinarily disclosed, in two emails.
What to check on your own bottle
This site’s central finding is a negative one about the material supplied to this desk. Your bottle may carry more than the images did, and if it does, that is worth knowing.
- Is there a Supplement Facts panel anywhere — on the bottle, a carton or an insert? None was supplied here. If yours has one, please send it to [email protected].
- Is there an Other Ingredients line? That is the one that names what the liquid is made with.
- Does the horse chestnut entry say seed, extract or standardised? Any of the three is more than the artwork supplied here shows.
- Is there a lot number and a date? Photograph both. Neither was legible on the images supplied.
- Is there a caution block, an allergen statement or a storage line? None appears in anything supplied.
- Is a manufacturer, packer or distributor named? None is named in anything supplied.
Six checks, each of which this desk would have to correct a page over. A site that only ever confirms itself is not checking anything.
The measurement you can make
One number on this product can be established by a buyer in a minute, without asking anybody. Squeeze two droppers into a marked oral syringe and read the volume. Then divide 59 by it.
Those three ranges are one uncertainty run three ways. The third is worth a moment: 600 mg of botanical material in one to two millilitres is roughly 30 to 50 per cent by weight per volume, a high loading for any preparation, on a bottle labelled alcohol free whose first instruction is “Shake well”. That is why question four is on the script. The label page sets out the arithmetic in full.
Who to ask, and how
Two routes can answer, one cannot, and the bottle offers nothing at all.
- +1 (302) 200-3480 — the order line, with your order ID. Described in the seller pack as a default order desk, and the same number was supplied with an unrelated product in an earlier batch, so expect a question about the horse chestnut form to be passed on.
- [email protected] — the sales email. Use this one for the five questions: a written answer has a date on it.
- [email protected] — this site’s editorial address. It cannot see orders. Send it label photographs, corrections and anything a seller told you, and it will be published if it checks out.
- The label — Not printed on the bottle. Not printed. No manufacturer, packer or distributor appears on the product.
Ask before you pay if you can, and inside the window if you cannot. The guarantee page sets out how long that is, and the refund page has the procedure.
Questions about verification
What is the lot number?
The reference supplied with the pack is LYM-26/LY-1909. This site publishes it as a draft reference, because no bottle image legible enough to confirm it was supplied.
Is there a Certificate of Analysis?
A reference exists — LYM-1909-26-LY — but the document itself was not supplied, so nothing about its contents can be reported.
What should I ask first?
For the Supplement Facts panel. It is the document every other question depends on.
Why ask about the horse chestnut form?
Because NCCIH calls the raw plant material unsafe taken orally and the standardised seed extract likely safe, and the label states neither.
What if nobody answers?
Then the disclosure position is what this site describes, and the 60-day window from purchase is how a buyer acts on it.
Ask for the panel, and ask about the horse chestnut
A 2 fl oz bottle of liquid drops, two droppers a day, and no Supplement Facts panel on anything supplied with it. The only quantity that exists — 600 mg of blend a serving — is printed in a marketing graphic. No price was supplied either; the live figure and the 60-day return terms are on the seller’s checkout screen.
60-day window · Questions first? Call +1 (302) 200-3480